you're reading...

Update on the Animal Rights activists use of sensationalism

Tonight I watched an investigative report on a major networks late night news show Nightline  that was about dairy farms. The sensationalism used in these stories is getting harder to watch as a second generation farmer whose family has cared for our animals comfort for nearly 40 years. I feel the media and activist groups use isolated incidents to create a sense of a major problem when quite the opposite is true. In the video I listened to the farmer say he does not stand for the improper care of animals and has previously fired employees for just that. I only wish he was able to express whether the employee(s) in this incident had been let go. If you want to see a video of animals on an average dairy you can see a video I did for Evernote. The California Milk Advisory Board also has put together some great videos of average dairymen and dairy families throughout California.

The dairy farmers  in the United States are working toward implementing a best care practices program for animal care called the National Dairy FARM Program. when this program is in place we will have an animal care manual that all dairy farms can use to continue to provide the highest level of care for their animals.

A great friend of mine Jeff Fowle, a cattle rancher from northern California has a great post on his blog Common Sense Agriculture discussing  animal rights versus animal welfare and why we should pay close attention to the difference.

In addition the post I made on this topic in September of 2009 is still pertinent as is the post referenced below from Dino Giacomazzi.

Sensationalism and the Animal Rights movement

September 29, 2009

Below is a link to a blog post by a fellow California Dairyman Dino Giacomazzi. Dino does an awesome job highlighting the unnecessary pressure and sensationalism some Animal right groups are using to ban the docking of Cattle Tails in CA. This is all unnecessary because no farm or dairy group opposes the ban and one group even supports the ban now that the farmer can provide prompt care for an injured animal.
I’m not a farmer but I play one on TV!

About raylindairy

Ray is a partner with his parents in Ray-Lin Dairy in Denair, Ca. The operation milks 475 cows and double crops corn & winter forage on 130 of the 240 acres with about 90 acres of pasture. The family also has 1200 ac operation in Klamath Falls OR that raises alfalfa hay, wheat hay, and oat hay. Ray is currently secretary of the Agchat Foundation an entity he helped found whose mission is to empower farmer to use social media. He is currently a on the board of directors of CA Dairy Campaign, Dairy CARES, and is the 2nd Vice-President of Stanislaus County Farm Bureau. He is also a member of the National Dairy Board. In addition to his involvement in agricultural organizations’ he is the Chairperson of the Governance Committee at a newly formed charter school his daughter attends, and serves as a director for the East Stanislaus Resource Conservation District. Ray and his wife Erica live on the dairy with their two children.


11 thoughts on “Update on the Animal Rights activists use of sensationalism

  1. Thanks for sharing the real truth behind America’s Dairy Farms.

    Posted by Robin Rastani | January 27, 2010, 8:02 AM
  2. Humans don’t need milk, except for their mother’s.

    Posted by Antonio | January 27, 2010, 12:41 PM
  3. Silly me! Two years ago I never imagined that a cow would be killed if she was no longer “productive”. Ouch! Overnight I went from a milk drinking “vegetarian” to vegan.

    Fortunately, it’s been the best decision I ever made… I’ve found wonderful and healthy plant based alternatives to every product I ate before! And my healthy has improved immensely as well.

    No matter how bucolic the setting is – In the end, the calves are stolen from their mothers… the mothers milk is stolen for humans. And each of those animals is subsequently killed for their flesh. I’m glad news is getting out – And that many find this arrangement entirely unacceptable.

    Thanks for inviting comment. Go Vegan 🙂

    Posted by Bea Elliott | January 28, 2010, 9:10 AM
  4. We need to hit back hard at the hit pieces like Nightline did last week on dairy farming. Drovers editor Greg Henderson had this comment: “We can criticize the national media for ‘sensationalism,’ but the only way we can put an end to these unflattering videos and critical news reports is to get the bad apples out of our barrels.”

    How exactly do we get rid of the “bad apples?”

    My fear is that a lot of dairy producers, both bad apples as well as good, conscientious operators, have gone out of business in the past year. The boom and bust cycles in dairy (and beef feeding, to a lesser extent) seem to go on unabated, despite mostly lip service from politicians and a small group of producers that seem to be shouting in the wilderness. Occasionally you have a case like Dean Foods getting sued by the Justice Dept. for buying two milk plants in Wisconsin, but does anyone seriously believe that will help improve milk prices for producers who have used up all their equity and can’t find any bank to lend them more money to stay afloat?

    The only long-term solution is either higher demand or lower supply, or a combination of both. The national media and groups like PETA are doing their best to kill demand, and 4.5 million heifers (USDA report from Dec.) says supply will soon shoot up again.
    Milk futures prices dropped a dollar or more in the past week. Did anyone outside the dairy industry notice or care? How much did milk prices drop in stores?

    I grew up on a “typical” Wisconsin 50-cow dairy farm that is nearly extinct. At this rate, in 30 years there will be about 12 dairy farmers left in the United States. And I’m not just pining for everything nostalgic because some aspects of the “good old days” weren’t all that good, but the values like work ethic and honesty that my upbringing instilled in me are lost on the next generation. And we’ll never get that back.

    Posted by Ron | February 4, 2010, 10:51 AM
  5. Ooops! Speaking of “hitting back hard” — Looks like another bunch of those “bad apples” got caught again:

    Let’s see that’s about one every 2 months or so — And those are the ones that get caught. But cow’s milk is supposed to be so “wholesome”… R-i-g-h-t!

    Posted by Bea Elliott | May 25, 2010, 11:47 PM
  6. Work to eliminate unethical farmers, like E6 Cattle. Every time a farmer wants to attack “sensationalism” (hmmm . . . it is a “sensation” because the public thinks it is wrong!!!!) from the national media, it sends the message that the farming industry has something to hide. “Hit back” (what a terrible phrase – in light of the video – one above commenter used) on farmers who engage in such atrocities.

    Ray-Lind, your posting is helpful to me, as I have encountered numerous postings from farmers or those in the agro business, who see such videos as an “us” (dairy, beef, pork or poultry farmers) versus “them” (animal rights activists). However, the REASON such films become so viral is because the general public – mostly meat eaters – have no tolerance for such things. This is not an “us” versus “them” . . . except in one area. That is, for everyone, most importantly YOUR INDUSTRY to oppose such atrocities. YOUR INDUSTRY should work hard to eliminate such farming practices.

    That will improve the industries image. However, additional damage is done every time a farmer or agricultural industry member attacks vegetarians, vegans or those who film such horrors.

    Amy B. . . . a meat eater and milk drinker . . . at the moment.

    Posted by ABlakeney | April 23, 2011, 1:58 PM
    • The reason you see an “US” versus them from some farmers is because they are hurt by what they see in the videos in addition to the video painting them with the same broad brush. There is nothing more disheartening than automatically being labeled as something when everything you do is the exact opposite of the label. We as farmers need to learn to react differently and use the mislabelling as motivation to tell our own stories.

      Posted by raylindairy | May 4, 2011, 10:35 PM
      • No… Dear Sir or Madam that’s not entirely true that “everything you do is the exact opposite of the label”. You do raise animals to kill – And there is a certain implication of negative baggage that comes with that.

        I once heard someone say, and it’s stuck with me ever since… As a staunch “non-veg” type person he said: “What does it matter how we treat them… We’re going to kill/eat them anyways.”

        Now, I know farmers/ranchers will say that’s not the case at all… But it really isn’t a giant leap from one line of thinking to the next – It’s really only a baby step. The premise is that these animals are valued for their bodies, not for their lives. And therein lies the slippery slope that anything goes… Well, even killing them in the end! For money no less! Hard to get away from that notion.

        Good luck telling your story – But as I’m sure you know… The devil is in the details.

        Posted by Bea Ⓥ Elliott | May 5, 2011, 5:23 AM


  1. Pingback: How to tell accurate dog news from sensationalism | - July 29, 2010

  2. Pingback: Is going Vegan the answer to animal abuse? « Ray-Lin Dairy - April 19, 2011

  3. Pingback: Animal Abuse: Still a Big No No! | Dairy Innovation - April 20, 2011

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Farmer Bloggers


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 15,923 other followers

Follow the herd on Facebook!


%d bloggers like this: